THE RUBBER DUCK™

Q Drop #2689

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/acting-attorney-general-and-secretary-homeland-security-submit-joint-report-impact-foreign
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-court/supreme-court-upholds-photo-id-voting-law-idUSWAT00940020080428
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article92593512.html
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article215247000.html
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q

Image attached to this drop

Graphic titled "The map where illegal immigrants live perfectly overlaps the blue counties where Democrats vote," with two U.S. maps.
Graphic titled "The map where illegal immigrants live perfectly overlaps the blue counties where Democrats vote," with two U.S. maps.

Context

Drop 2689: “You are the news now,” February 11, 2019

Terms in this drop: SC = Supreme Court

What they’ve always said

The standard public account, quoted exactly

“Although the specific conclusions within the joint report must remain classified, the Departments have concluded there is no evidence to date that any identified activities of a foreign government or foreign agent had a material impact on the integrity or security of election infrastructure or political/campaign infrastructure used in the 2018 midterm elections for the United States Congress.”

U.S. Department of Justice, press release, February 5, 2019 (linked in the drop) · justice.gov

“By a vote of 6 to 3, the Court upheld the law, concluding that the photo I.D. requirement was closely related to Indiana’s legitimate state interests in preventing voter fraud.”

Oyez, “Crawford v. Marion County Election Board” (2008), the voter ID ruling the drop cites · oyez.org

The comms

The Rubber Duck’s own account, from posts on X

TV IS FOR NARRATIVES.
WE ARE THE NEWS NOW.
don't cuk for the tv.
ever.

BY 2019 - THE Q OPERATION had reached critical mass by circumventing the MSM narrative to deliver the message. …

when anons finally wrestled the narrative away from the msm - becoming the news now.
shine on you crazy diamonds!!

Quotes are exact. “…” marks omitted text. Emoji characters and t.co media links in the X posts are left out per site rules. Dates in ET.